The issue of religion in schools is considered a hot topic among debaters. Religion can be defined as “a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects”, according to Dictionary.com. Religious issues arise when dealing with the practicing and teaching of religion. When dealing with religion in practice, “In Illinois, a federal judge ruled against a state law requiring public school students to observe a moment of silence meant for prayer or personal reflection at the start of each school day. District Judge Robert Gettleman said the law was an unconstitutional breach of the separation of church and state.” (Calefati, 2009). I agree with this whole statement completely. I say this because it is crucial to see the word “prayer” being used in the law. Prayer is usually associated with religious practices, especially in churches. When an atheist saw this particular word, this person knew they had a chance to take down and get rid of the law. However, I believe the atheist may not have so much luck in trying to bring down the law if “prayer” was not mentioned within it. A moment of silence is neutral to everyone, including atheists.
When dealing with religion in teaching, “For the past 20 years, Texas’s science curriculum has required students to explore and critique “the strengths and weaknesses” of all scientific theories.” (et al.). This practice was neutral and fair concerning any old or new theory that came into existence. However, opposition has developed to change the curriculum. Both sides have great arguments to support their claims in keeping or changing the twenty year practice. “Scientists testified before the board that the “strengths and weaknesses” language is unacceptable because there are no scientifically verifiable weaknesses to Darwin’s theory of evolution.” “Some parents who spoke before the board said that their children had been intimidated and ridiculed by biology teachers when they questioned evolution and that there is nothing wrong with debating a theory that is not proven fact.” (et al.) It seems that both sides are almost evenly matched. I believe one of the only routes to satisfy both sides is to make a compromise between the two. In Christian thought, I know I could possibly create a story that would say Noah definitely had an ark, and the animals in it were the evolutionary ancestors of today’s animals just to pacify both sides who utilize creationism and evolutionism.
Whether people want to accept this or not, religion will always have a place in schools. Religion seeks to explain the universe, according to Dictionary.com, which means this one word can encompass many types of educational disciplines, including science. I sometimes wonder if people would realize that modern education could be considered religion, especially according to the definition mentioned earlier in the essay. Modern education is based on a set of beliefs and practices agreed upon by a number of people, right?
References:
Dictionary.com (n.d). Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/religion
Calefati, Jessica. (2009, January 22). “Religion in School Debate Heats Up.” U.S. News. Retrieved September 30, 2011, from https://elearn.mtsu.edu/d2l/lms/content/viewer/main_frame.d2l?ou=2975445&tId=19133302